- stage_1_part_3_updated_yaml_analysis.md (41,948 B): full analysis of
stage_1_part_3_v.8.yml — DAG, per-task IO with formats, asset deploy
locations (.py/.txt mirrors included), sub-task purposes, upstream/
downstream contracts; verified by sub-agent loop 6->1->0 findings
(all MINOR; diagram order corrected to code-measured sequence)
- problems_identified_in_detecting_assets_location_v.2.md: re-verified
all 8 items of the distribution survey §8 plus the 277-row manifest
gap (1st-pass measurement + one independent sub-agent recheck, 9/9
agreed). Two v.1 verdicts overturned with evidence: 277-file copy
recommendation rejected (superset-ledger design documented in 4 docs;
no gate scans those paths) and P3 header L24 "corruption" disproven
via creation-commit byte identity. Confirmed problems: R0 dead
constants, legacy_paths comment, 6 unanchored P1 assets (register
rows directly in deployment-origin manifest, count field updated),
plaintext Bearer token (rotation is the real fix — 402 files carry it;
SKILL.md has no secret-injection syntax)
- includes source docs from survey round: stage_1_2_3_assets_
distribution_location.md, problems_identified_...(v.1)
- v.7/MEMORY.md entries 24-25; session prompt log update
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
jhogyuandClaude Fable 5
2bd5a12902