Add prompt for collecting data on Theory of Requirement Facts in civil litigation
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
|
||||
# ExecPlan Protocol
|
||||
|
||||
An ExecPlan is a living, self-contained execution document for complex work.
|
||||
|
||||
## When an ExecPlan is required
|
||||
|
||||
Create or update an ExecPlan when any of the following is true:
|
||||
|
||||
- the task has multiple deliverables or materially dependent stages;
|
||||
- legal analysis and quantitative or coding work must be reconciled;
|
||||
- the task is high-stakes and errors would be difficult to detect from the final prose alone;
|
||||
- several source classes, jurisdictions, time periods, or datasets must be coordinated;
|
||||
- implementation spans multiple files or requires migration, validation, and rollback thinking;
|
||||
- subagents will be used;
|
||||
- the user explicitly requests a plan.
|
||||
|
||||
Do not create an ExecPlan for a small, well-scoped answer or a trivial code edit.
|
||||
|
||||
## Required structure
|
||||
|
||||
Create the plan under `plans/<task-slug>.md` unless the task specifies another location.
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# <Task>
|
||||
|
||||
## Objective
|
||||
## Deliverables
|
||||
## Scope and Non-Scope
|
||||
## Known Inputs
|
||||
## Material Assumptions
|
||||
## Questions That Could Change the Outcome
|
||||
## Workstreams and Dependencies
|
||||
## Source and Tool Plan
|
||||
## Validation Plan
|
||||
## Approval Boundaries
|
||||
## Progress
|
||||
- [ ] ...
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision Log
|
||||
| Date/Stage | Decision | Basis | Consequence |
|
||||
|
||||
## Evidence Ledger
|
||||
| Claim/Issue | Source or Test | Status | Notes |
|
||||
|
||||
## Risks and Failure Modes
|
||||
## Results and Residual Uncertainty
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Operating rules
|
||||
|
||||
- Keep the plan current; do not use it as ceremonial documentation.
|
||||
- Record material changes in the decision log.
|
||||
- Mark completed steps only after validation.
|
||||
- Split independent workstreams for subagents, but keep cross-cutting legal or methodological judgments with the main agent.
|
||||
- End with a concise record of what was completed, validated, deferred, or left uncertain.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user