Prayer_for_Relief_Docs/plans/evaluate-ten-case-v1s-2026-09-03.md

# Evaluate Ten Claim-Purpose V1 Rule Documents

## Objective

Apply `0_사건종류_추가/evaluation_prompt_on_1st_draft_v.1.txt` independently to the ten user-selected Korean civil claim-purpose V1 rule documents and save one reviewable evaluation report per case type.

## Deliverables

- `청구취지작성규칙_수표금청구_평가서_v1.md`
- `청구취지작성규칙_설계비시설대여금청구_평가서_v1.md`
- `청구취지작성규칙_신용장대금청구_평가서_v1.md`
- `청구취지작성규칙_신용카드이용대금청구_평가서_v1.md`
- `청구취지작성규칙_압류채권대금청구_평가서_v1.md`
- `청구취지작성규칙_운임운송대금청구_평가서_v1.md`
- `청구취지작성규칙_재산상속회복청구_평가서_v1.md`
- `청구취지작성규칙_특허권전용실시대금실용신안권실시대금청구_평가서_v1.md`
- `청구취지작성규칙_종류물대체물의지급또는인도를구하는소_평가서_v1.md`
- `청구취지작성규칙_장래이행의소_평가서_v1.md`

Each deliverable is saved in its matching `0_사건종류_추가/사건종류_<사건키>/` folder.

## Scope and Non-Scope

- Scope: evaluate completeness, accuracy/currentness, concision, authority integrity, and tree-to-form reachability under the supplied evaluation prompt.
- Jurisdiction and procedural frame: Republic of Korea civil litigation; professional draft review as of 2026-09-03 (Asia/Seoul).
- Inputs: each case folder's unique V1 and unique `취지기재례_*.pdf`, plus the normative portions of the V1 generation contract.
- Non-scope: editing any V1 or PDF, drafting V2, modifying unrelated files, or reading/updating `MEMORY_Claude.md`.

## Known Inputs

- The ten display names all occur in the source `# 사건 종류` list.
- Preflight found exactly one V1 and one PDF in every target folder.
- Preflight found no existing `*_평가서_v1.md` in any target folder.
- Initial V1 SHA-256 values are recorded in the Evidence Ledger below.

## Material Assumptions

- The user’s express direction to perform independent simultaneous parallel work controls over the evaluation prompt’s default sequential/main-agent-only execution policy.
- Independence is preserved by assigning disjoint case folders and requiring each case to begin from its own V1, PDF, generation contract, and fresh authority queue.
- Within a stream, one case’s report and validation finish before the next case begins.
- The final root-level pass reconciles only validation method and report consistency; it does not import one case’s substantive rules into another.

## Questions That Could Change the Outcome

- None at preflight. Every case name is valid, every input pair is unique, and no output requires overwrite approval.

## Workstreams and Dependencies

- Stream A: 수표금 청구 → 신용카드이용대금 청구 → 압류채권대금 청구.
- Stream B: 재산상속회복 청구 → 종류물(대체물)의 지급 또는 인도를 구하는 소 → 장래이행의 소.
- Stream C: 신용장대금 청구 → 특허권전용실시대금・실용신안권실시대금 청구.
- Stream D (root): 설계비・시설대여금 청구 → 운임(운송대금) 청구.
- Dependency: all ten case-level reports must pass case-local validation before cross-stream reconciliation and final reporting.

## Source and Tool Plan

- Read each V1 and PDF in full once; extract IDs, transitions, forms, citations, URLs, and PDF examples into a deduplicated case-local queue.
- Verify statutes first against the National Law Information Center, judgments/forms against Supreme Court or Korean court official sources, and other official institutional materials where relevant.
- Distinguish source existence, proposition support, temporal validity, and derived-rule fit.
- Run one focused search per case for amendments, scheduled rules, and relevant Supreme Court or en banc decisions from the three years preceding 2026-09-03.
- Record inaccessible material as `미검증`; do not infer nonexistence from failed access or zero-result searches.

## Validation Plan

- Confirm required sections `## 0` through `## 8`, valid UTF-8, nonempty output, no `###` token, and no accidental extra files.
- Confirm every partial/missing coverage entry links to a defect ID.
- Confirm every S1/S2 row has a V1 locator, concrete impact, official/internal structural evidence, verification status, and specific V2 action.
- Confirm every V1 external authority appears in the citation/currentness ledger.
- Reconcile defect IDs and S1/S2/S3 totals across sections 0, 1, 2, 4, and 6.
- Recompute all ten V1 SHA-256 values and compare with preflight.

## Approval Boundaries

- No external writes, publication, messages, dependency installation, destructive commands, or overwrite of existing deliverables.
- Local creation of the ten requested reports and this living plan is authorized.

## Progress

- [x] Read governing repository workflows and the complete evaluation prompt.
- [x] Confirm the ten case names in the source list.
- [x] Confirm one V1, one PDF, and zero existing evaluation reports per target.
- [x] Record initial V1 hashes.
- [x] Complete Stream A reports and case-local validation.
- [x] Complete Stream B reports and case-local validation.
- [x] Complete Stream C reports and case-local validation.
- [x] Complete Stream D reports and case-local validation.
- [x] Perform cross-stream structural, citation-ledger, count, UTF-8, token, and hash validation.
- [x] Record aggregate results and residual uncertainty.

## Decision Log

| Date/Stage | Decision | Basis | Consequence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-03 / intake | Use four disjoint concurrent streams with sequential fresh cycles inside each stream. | The user expressly requested independent simultaneous parallel work; only four active slots are available. | Maximizes concurrency without two agents touching the same case folder. |
| 2026-09-03 / preflight | Proceed without an overwrite question. | All ten output counts were zero. | Reports may be created directly. |
| 2026-09-03 / source policy | Treat 2026-09-03 as the legal-currentness cutoff and preserve access failures as `미검증`. | Repository evidence policy and evaluation prompt. | No unsupported negative inference from network or search failures. |
| 2026-09-03 / report normalization | Use only `완전/부분/누락/적법한 제외/미검증` in section 1 and allocate each defect once to one of the three evaluation axes. | The evaluation prompt fixes the status vocabulary and three independent axes. | Cross-case totals are comparable without changing case-specific legal judgments. |
| 2026-09-03 / final validation | Treat literal validator keywords in acceptance-checklist prose as avoidable false positives and replace them without changing substance. | Independent read-only validation found three checklist mentions, not unresolved values. | All ten reports pass the same deterministic token check. |

## Evidence Ledger

| Claim/Issue | Source or Test | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ten requested display names are valid | `청구취지규칙문서_추가작업_Sep_2.txt`, `# 사건 종류` | Verified | Exact names found. |
| 수표금 V1 immutability baseline | SHA-256 | Verified | `ec2827a641b7d77f7179953bb162202b5dc9bfa71bff10e545c45a3bd4acb38c` |
| 설계비·시설대여금 V1 immutability baseline | SHA-256 | Verified | `e4060d08a1544caed4fdb244f6238251cea1e212cfe145ddefc63aed1955a188` |
| 신용장대금 V1 immutability baseline | SHA-256 | Verified | `94accd066244708d98e14647eb7650921008bf48b3b09a19f17b171a1c2a50be` |
| 신용카드이용대금 V1 immutability baseline | SHA-256 | Verified | `0bb465d57acddbe6aef04b9800e4370b6502f553fbf33b7d26e7d90850f4a942` |
| 압류채권대금 V1 immutability baseline | SHA-256 | Verified | `851047c7c44ca4b91b2d5df79dac7991cced7a4ac74294708409cece1b089299` |
| 운임·운송대금 V1 immutability baseline | SHA-256 | Verified | `4e3f66a62e444f46ebb38bc05197fec620d30b8de8fd63b343b90353de7306aa` |
| 재산상속회복 V1 immutability baseline | SHA-256 | Verified | `eb898002a2f2ab46693ce363b5fd6257f412db85debcd09f85615bc3f02c683a` |
| 특허·실용신안 실시대금 V1 immutability baseline | SHA-256 | Verified | `69dc8d12516d4ecba34224c124441b3a32adb98e574e7af4cf8ca1991fcfd142` |
| 종류물·대체물 V1 immutability baseline | SHA-256 | Verified | `10902725779fcd298ea56202d888a181617725c83184f697e7b25d5d12db28ef` |
| 장래이행 V1 immutability baseline | SHA-256 | Verified | `5f382f8c70903c05cd6ec24731623f2d5e5e6c304f824b40bf677e4e24920a79` |
| Inputs and output absence | `find`, line count, file count | Verified | Each folder: V1=1, PDF=1, output=0. |
| Ten requested evaluation reports | File inventory and title/path match | Verified | Exactly one matching report in every target folder; no target is missing or duplicated. |
| Required structure and encoding | Heading/status/token/UTF-8 checks | Verified | All ten reports have `## 0` through `## 8` once and in order, use allowed coverage states, are nonempty UTF-8, and contain no unresolved or forbidden token. |
| Defect accounting | Section 0 totals versus section 2 rows | Verified | All ten reports reconcile; aggregate count is S1 83, S2 94, S3 35. |
| V1 immutability | Final SHA-256 batch comparison | Verified | All ten final hashes equal the preflight baselines. |

## Risks and Failure Modes

- Official-source access may fail or expose only metadata; unresolved propositions must remain `미검증`.
- Old PDF examples may encode superseded rates or practice; they are coverage inputs, not current authority.
- Generic monetary-claim boilerplate can conceal case-specific party, maturity, document-presentation, limitation, or enforcement issues.
- Unicode normalization differs between display names and filesystem folder names; validation must resolve actual paths instead of synthesizing them blindly.
- Parallel reports may use inconsistent severity calibration; the root pass must reconcile rubric use without homogenizing substantive findings.

## Results and Residual Uncertainty

| Case type | Overall result | S1/S2/S3 |
|---|---|---:|
| 수표금 청구 | 개정 필요 | 6/9/5 |
| 설계비・시설대여금 청구 | 개정 필요 | 11/8/5 |
| 신용장대금 청구 | 개정 필요 | 15/10/4 |
| 신용카드이용대금 청구 | 개정 필요 | 7/12/5 |
| 압류채권대금 청구 | 개정 필요 | 9/11/4 |
| 운임(운송대금) 청구 | 개정 필요 | 14/6/5 |
| 재산상속회복 청구 | 개정 필요 | 5/9/0 |
| 특허권전용실시대금・실용신안권실시대금 청구 | 개정 필요 | 10/10/4 |
| 종류물(대체물)의 지급 또는 인도를 구하는 소 | 개정 필요 | 3/9/2 |
| 장래이행의 소 | 개정 필요 | 3/10/1 |
| 합계 | 10건 모두 개정 필요 | 83/94/35 |

Final batch validation passed 10/10 reports: required sections, title/path match, allowed coverage states, partial/missing-to-defect links, defect totals, UTF-8, forbidden-token scan, and all ten V1 hashes.

Residual uncertainty is case-specific and disclosed in each report. It principally concerns inaccessible historical or lower-court full text, contract/terms incorporation and underlying transaction facts, temporal application of selected amended rules or notices, and legal characterization that requires a qualified lawyer with the complete record. No evaluation axis is left in `판정 유보`; confirmed defects independently support `개정 필요` in every case.